<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inclusivity Is Not A Double Standard: Why Forbes is Wrong about Women in Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laurenbacon.com/inclusivity-double-standard-forbes-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laurenbacon.com/inclusivity-double-standard-forbes-wrong/</link>
	<description>I&#039;m curious for a living.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:15:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Men (and Everyone, Really) Can Do To Support Gender Equity in Tech &#124; Lauren Bacon</title>
		<link>http://www.laurenbacon.com/inclusivity-double-standard-forbes-wrong/#comment-3139</link>
		<dc:creator>What Men (and Everyone, Really) Can Do To Support Gender Equity in Tech &#124; Lauren Bacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurenbacon.com/?p=808#comment-3139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] out what Etsy has been up to in their successful efforts to recruit more women [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out what Etsy has been up to in their successful efforts to recruit more women [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How SendGrid and PlayHaven bungled the Adria Richards situation and how they could have fixed it &#124; Impressions Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.laurenbacon.com/inclusivity-double-standard-forbes-wrong/#comment-2830</link>
		<dc:creator>How SendGrid and PlayHaven bungled the Adria Richards situation and how they could have fixed it &#124; Impressions Matter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurenbacon.com/?p=808#comment-2830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Women are understandably frustrated. And even successful and important initiatives to bring more women into developer jobs are being criticized, as Lauren Bacon rightly points out regarding the Etsy engineers project. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Women are understandably frustrated. And even successful and important initiatives to bring more women into developer jobs are being criticized, as Lauren Bacon rightly points out regarding the Etsy engineers project. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inclusivity Is Not A Double Standard: Why Forbes is Wrong about Women in Tech &#124; Lauren Bacon &#124; Women &#38; Tech &#124; Scoop.it</title>
		<link>http://www.laurenbacon.com/inclusivity-double-standard-forbes-wrong/#comment-2510</link>
		<dc:creator>Inclusivity Is Not A Double Standard: Why Forbes is Wrong about Women in Tech &#124; Lauren Bacon &#124; Women &#38; Tech &#124; Scoop.it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurenbacon.com/?p=808#comment-2510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &quot;In my experience as an employer, no technical interview in the world beats the ability to observe coders working on projects. You learn far more by watching them work on real-world projects than you ever will watching them try to perform a test under pressure.&quot;&#160; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &quot;In my experience as an employer, no technical interview in the world beats the ability to observe coders working on projects. You learn far more by watching them work on real-world projects than you ever will watching them try to perform a test under pressure.&quot;&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://www.laurenbacon.com/inclusivity-double-standard-forbes-wrong/#comment-2367</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurenbacon.com/?p=808#comment-2367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did anyone actually think what&#039;s better for customers, collaborative style or pissing contests?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone actually think what&#8217;s better for customers, collaborative style or pissing contests?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://www.laurenbacon.com/inclusivity-double-standard-forbes-wrong/#comment-2366</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurenbacon.com/?p=808#comment-2366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, is networking and referrals (which result in men hiring more men like them) considered &quot;lowering standards&quot;? If not, then the competition where women are not given the same public attention to benefit from, is simply unfair.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, is networking and referrals (which result in men hiring more men like them) considered &#8220;lowering standards&#8221;? If not, then the competition where women are not given the same public attention to benefit from, is simply unfair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cv harquail</title>
		<link>http://www.laurenbacon.com/inclusivity-double-standard-forbes-wrong/#comment-2364</link>
		<dc:creator>cv harquail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 04:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurenbacon.com/?p=808#comment-2364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lauren, thanks for setting this out so clearly. 

I myself started a post several times, but got frustrated trying to address Casserly&#039;s argument because it was not only wrong but uninformed. 

It appears that Casserly didn&#039;t listen to Kellan&#039;s actual presentation at in its entirety.  If she had, she&#039;d have realized that her assumptions and concerns had been anticipated and dealt with rather nicely in Kellan&#039;s explanation and ---even better-- in the tactics Etsy employed. 

    I was also concerned because Casserly&#039;s reporting/opeds are usually better.... Maybe not incisive analysis, but usually drawn from the actual evidence available. It made me wonder what really went wrong for her as she approached this story. Her post tells us more about the expected criticism of a corporate effort towards inclusivity that it does about what Etsy / Kellan / Hackerschool / Marc actually did. The post was just plain bad reporting, topped with a polarizing headline.

Thank goodness that the story got much more coverage that was correct and that reiterated the real learning. And thank goodness for this thorough treatment from you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lauren, thanks for setting this out so clearly. </p>
<p>I myself started a post several times, but got frustrated trying to address Casserly&#8217;s argument because it was not only wrong but uninformed. </p>
<p>It appears that Casserly didn&#8217;t listen to Kellan&#8217;s actual presentation at in its entirety.  If she had, she&#8217;d have realized that her assumptions and concerns had been anticipated and dealt with rather nicely in Kellan&#8217;s explanation and &#8212;even better&#8211; in the tactics Etsy employed. </p>
<p>    I was also concerned because Casserly&#8217;s reporting/opeds are usually better&#8230;. Maybe not incisive analysis, but usually drawn from the actual evidence available. It made me wonder what really went wrong for her as she approached this story. Her post tells us more about the expected criticism of a corporate effort towards inclusivity that it does about what Etsy / Kellan / Hackerschool / Marc actually did. The post was just plain bad reporting, topped with a polarizing headline.</p>
<p>Thank goodness that the story got much more coverage that was correct and that reiterated the real learning. And thank goodness for this thorough treatment from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.laurenbacon.com/inclusivity-double-standard-forbes-wrong/#comment-2359</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurenbacon.com/?p=808#comment-2359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aha! That&#039;s great to hear - and not surprising, as I&#039;m sure there were lots of great candidates.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha! That&#8217;s great to hear &#8211; and not surprising, as I&#8217;m sure there were lots of great candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison</title>
		<link>http://www.laurenbacon.com/inclusivity-double-standard-forbes-wrong/#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurenbacon.com/?p=808#comment-2358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Lauren! 

Etsy did indeed hire both men and women from Hacker School.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Lauren! </p>
<p>Etsy did indeed hire both men and women from Hacker School.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.laurenbacon.com/inclusivity-double-standard-forbes-wrong/#comment-2355</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurenbacon.com/?p=808#comment-2355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lauren, thank you for this. In conversations I&#039;ve had with engineers who are actively trying to change the ratio in their own organizations, I&#039;ve heard deeps sighs of relief that we may be able to change the way we hire. It&#039;s not that the gladiator trials hire better engineers, it&#039;s that they hire a certain kind of engineer. You need diversity of skills, temperaments, experience -- as well as gender -- to have a team that can scale and meet new challenges. 
Thanks to Etsy we have data that proves that a modern version of the apprentice model can work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lauren, thank you for this. In conversations I&#8217;ve had with engineers who are actively trying to change the ratio in their own organizations, I&#8217;ve heard deeps sighs of relief that we may be able to change the way we hire. It&#8217;s not that the gladiator trials hire better engineers, it&#8217;s that they hire a certain kind of engineer. You need diversity of skills, temperaments, experience &#8212; as well as gender &#8212; to have a team that can scale and meet new challenges.<br />
Thanks to Etsy we have data that proves that a modern version of the apprentice model can work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks for February 14th from 18:03 to 22:55 : Extenuating Circumstances</title>
		<link>http://www.laurenbacon.com/inclusivity-double-standard-forbes-wrong/#comment-2340</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks for February 14th from 18:03 to 22:55 : Extenuating Circumstances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurenbacon.com/?p=808#comment-2340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] [toread] Inclusivity Is Not A Double Standard: Why Forbes is Wrong about Women in Tech &#124; Lauren Baco... &#8211; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [toread] Inclusivity Is Not A Double Standard: Why Forbes is Wrong about Women in Tech | Lauren Baco&#8230; &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
